There’s a lot of meaning about the nature web content packed into this sentence from Tumblr in their announcement of a redesigned publishing interface:
After months of careful crafting, we’ve reduced creation on Tumblr to its essence, while carrying over every single feature and making room for some BIG new ones (like completely customizable drag-and-drop photoset creation, faster uploads, and inline reblogging!).
There’s so much about the state of online news media that is summed up in this paragraph in a story about Slate and the pivots it’s trying to make:
In this regard, Slate is like other high-minded publications navigating a tough, even contradictory mission. On one hand, they promise smart and independent ideas; on the other, they’re heeding social media metrics that could tug them to the lowest common denominator. While news sites like BuzzFeed cut their teeth on silly cat photos only to climb up the intellectual and media food chain, it’s unclear whether this process can work in the opposite direction.
The ending of The Verge’s piece on the current state of traffic and editorial direction at digg is all about how the site, at this moment, isn’t giving people enough power and say in what stories are surfaced on the front page and how there aren’t profiles people can set up. And it ends with this conclusion:
The last time Digg took some control back from users was in 2010, when the “version 4” redesign caused a revolt and mass exodus to Reddit. That level of disaster hasn’t happened with this redesign. But without empowering its users, Digg may have trouble making a real dent in the online conversation.
Like this:
Like Loading...